Governance that can answer the hard question.
Not checkbox compliance. Decision rights, evidence, and controls built from how your AI systems actually operate, so the board, the regulator, and the operator get the same answer.
Assess
Comprehensive evaluation of your current AI landscape, governance maturity, and risk posture.
Design
Tailored governance framework design aligned with your regulatory environment and business objectives.
Implement
Hands-on implementation of policies, controls, and monitoring systems with your team.
Sustain
Ongoing advisory, internal audit support, and continuous improvement to maintain compliance.
Frameworks
Standards we use as instruments.
The leading AI governance and security frameworks, applied to your actual systems and regulatory exposure rather than recited at them.
The international standard for AI management systems. We help you implement and prepare for certification of a comprehensive AI governance framework.
- Gap analysis & readiness assessment
- AIMS implementation
- Policy & procedure development
- Internal audit support
- Certification preparation
Security controls for large language model applications. From prompt injection to supply chain vulnerabilities, we assess and harden your LLM deployments.
- LLM security assessment
- Prompt injection testing
- Output handling review
- Data leakage prevention
- Supply chain analysis
Security framework for autonomous AI agents. We evaluate tool-use risks, delegation chains, and the unique attack surface of agentic systems.
- Agent architecture review
- Tool-use security audit
- Delegation chain analysis
- MCP security assessment
- Human-in-the-loop controls
The Secure AI Framework provides a conceptual model for securing AI systems. We map SAIF principles to your organization's specific AI deployment landscape.
- SAIF alignment assessment
- Security foundation mapping
- Threat model development
- Control implementation
- Continuous monitoring
Start here
Find out what your AI already depends on.
A first brief maps the AI systems already in operation, the dependencies underneath them, and the evidence gaps a regulator or board would find first.
One conversation to scope the question. A written brief in two to six weeks.